Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings table ‐ Midwife continuity models vs other models of care: Induction of labour
- Population
- childbearing women and their infants (all) (important/secondary outcomes)
- Intervention
- Summary of findings table ‐ Midwife continuity models
- Comparison
- other models of care
- Outcome
- Induction of labour
Summary of findings table ‐ Midwife continuity models showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with other models of care (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Midwife continuity models vs other models of care Induction of labour · childbearing women and their infants (all) (important/secondary outcomes) Summary of findings table ‐ Midwife continuity models showed no clear difference in induction of labour compared with other models of care (low certainty). Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.92 [0.85, 1] | 14 studies · 17666 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Midwife continuity of care models versus other models of care for childbearing women 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.