Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings: one active intervention vs other active intervention: 3.2.3 Includes musculoskeletal versus does not include musculoskeletal Motor function scales Immediate outcomes
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: one active intervention vs another active intervention 3.2.3 Includes musculoskeletal versus does not include musculoskeletal Motor function scales Immediate outcomes · adults with stroke Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 4 studies · 81 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.