Question · asked by 1 review
RDP with lingual plate major connector vs RDP with sublingual bar major connector: Abutment mobility
- Population
- Partially edentulous patients treated with a mandibular RDP (major connector)
- Intervention
- RDP with lingual plate major connector
- Comparison
- RDP with sublingual bar major connector
- Outcome
- Abutment mobility
RDP with lingual plate major connector led to lower abutment tooth mobility (Periotest) at 30 months compared with RDP with sublingual bar major connector; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
RDP with lingual plate major connector vs RDP with sublingual bar major connector Abutment tooth mobility (Periotest) at 30 months · Partially edentulous patients treated with a mandibular RDP (major connector) · 30 months RDP with lingual plate major connector led to lower abutment tooth mobility (Periotest) at 30 months compared with RDP with sublingual bar major connector; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -1.99 [-3.36, -0.62] | 1 study · 36 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: partially absent dentition 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2011-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.