Duodenal stenting vs surgical palliation: Time to recurrence of obstructive symptoms
Duodenal stenting showed no clear difference in time to recurrence of obstructive symptoms compared with surgical palliation (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Duodenal stenting vs surgical palliation Time to recurrence of obstructive symptoms · people with malignant gastric outlet obstruction Duodenal stenting showed no clear difference in time to recurrence of obstructive symptoms compared with surgical palliation (moderate certainty). Stent placement versus surgical palliation for adults with malignant gastric outlet obstruction (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 5.08 [0.96, 26.74] | 2 studies · 57 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stent placement versus surgical palliation for adults with malignant gastric outlet obstruction 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.