Question · asked by 1 review
Active stimulation vs Placebo (sham/placebo device): Adverse events: need for reoperation/ reimplantation
- Population
- adults with chronic pain
- Intervention
- Active stimulation
- Comparison
- Placebo (sham/placebo device)
- Outcome
- Adverse events: need for reoperation/ reimplantation
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 3 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Active stimulation vs placebo (sham) Adverse events: Need for reoperation/ reimplantation · adults with chronic pain The review found no eligible studies for this question. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Active stimulation vs placebo (sham) Adverse events: Need for reoperation/reimplantation · adults with chronic pain The review found no eligible studies for this question. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Active stimulation vs placebo (sham) Adverse events: need for reoperation/ reimplantation · adults with chronic pain The review found no eligible studies for this question. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.