Question · asked by 1 review
Low‐level laser therapy vs fascial manipulation: Adverse events
- Population
- carpal tunnel syndrome
- Intervention
- Low‐level laser therapy
- Comparison
- fascial manipulation
- Outcome
- Adverse events
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Low‐level laser therapy vs fascial manipulation Adverse events · carpal tunnel syndrome The review found no eligible studies for this question. Low‐level laser therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low‐level laser therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Low‐level laser therapy vs placebo · carpal tunnel syndrome · 1 review
- Low‐level laser therapy vs ultrasound · carpal tunnel syndrome · 1 review
- Low‐level laser therapy vs Placebo (sham) laser therapy · Patients of any age in any setting requiring intervention for iatrogenic injury to the… · 1 review
- Low‐level laser therapy vs placebo · patients with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.