Question · asked by 1 review
38% SDF (one-time application) vs Information unavailable: new carious lesions or fillings
- Population
- Children with dental caries in permanent (first) molars
- Intervention
- 38% SDF (one-time application)
- Comparison
- Information unavailable
- Outcome
- new carious lesions or fillings
SDF had a 57% preventative fraction; the comparator was not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
38% SDF one-time application vs Information unavailable new carious lesions or fillings · children with caries in permanent first molars · 12 months, Argentina SDF had a 57% preventative fraction; the comparator was not reported. A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent… (2023) All outcomes | Preventative fraction (%) 57 | 1 study · 141 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent teeth. 2023 All outcomes | December 2022 | 13 | Low / Critically Low |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.