Question · asked by 1 review

Daily chewing gum for 2 weeks or longer vs No gum chewing or control: Salivary flow rate (unstimulated)

Population
Elderly (>60 years) and medically compromised adults with xerostomia / dry mouth
Intervention
Daily chewing gum for 2 weeks or longer
Comparison
No gum chewing or control
Outcome
Salivary flow rate (unstimulated)

codex

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Daily chewing gum for 2 weeks or longer vs No gum chewing or control
Unstimulated whole salivary flow rate · Elderly people and medically compromised people with xerostomia · 2 to 12 weeks, Meta-regression slope for change in standardized salivary flow rate per additional week of chewing, Meta-regression by chewing duration
codex
The effect of gum chewing on xerostomia and salivary flow rate in elderly and medically compromised… (2023) All outcomes
SMD per week 0.066 studies · 291 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.