Question · asked by 1 review

Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs Chlorhexidine mouthrinse: Presence of dry socket

Population
Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars)
Intervention
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket)
Comparison
Chlorhexidine mouthrinse
Outcome
Presence of dry socket

Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) showed no clear difference in presence of dry socket compared with chlorhexidine rinse (0.12%) (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 50%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs Chlorhexidine rinse (0.12%)
Presence of dry socket · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) showed no clear difference in presence of dry socket compared with chlorhexidine rinse (0.12%) (low certainty).
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 0.74 [0.46, 1.20]2 studies · 383 participantsLow
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) vs Chlorhexidine rinse (0.12%)
Presence of dry socket · Adults (>18 years) having permanent tooth extraction (predominantly mandibular third molars) · Follow-up: median 7 days
Chlorhexidine gel (0.2%, intrasocket) showed no clear difference in presence of dry socket compared with chlorhexidine rinse (0.12%); GRADE not reported.
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2012) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD006968.PUB2, superseded
RR 0.30 [0.09, 1.04]1 study · 72 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket)
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-09Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.