Question · asked by 1 review

Doxapram vs no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline, aminophylline, or caffeine), or: 4a.Death at any time during initial hospitalization – doxapram compared to no treatment for the treatment of apnea

Population
prevention of reintubation
Intervention
Doxapram
Comparison
no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline, aminophylline, or caffeine), or
Outcome
4a.Death at any time during initial hospitalization – doxapram compared to no treatment for the treatment of apnea

It is very uncertain whether doxapram changes 4c. Death (at any time during initial hospitalization) – doxapram as… compared with no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline,… (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Doxapram vs no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline, aminophylline, or caffeine), or
4c. Death (at any time during initial hospitalization) – doxapram as an adjunct to methylxanthine compared to methylxanthine alone for the prevention of reintubation · prevention of reintubation
It is very uncertain whether doxapram changes 4c. Death (at any time during initial hospitalization) – doxapram as… compared with no treatment, placebo, methylxanthine (including theophylline,… (very low certainty).
Doxapram for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.43 [0.34, 6.01]2 studies · 85 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Doxapram for the prevention and treatment of apnea in preterm infants
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.