Any O‐BCS vs S‐BCS: Local recurrence
Any O‐BCS showed no clear difference in local recurrence rates (up to 5 years) compared with S‐BCS (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Any O‐BCS vs S‐BCS Local recurrence rates (up to 5 years) · women with primary breast cancer Any O‐BCS showed no clear difference in local recurrence rates (up to 5 years) compared with S‐BCS (low certainty). Oncoplastic breast‐conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | HR 1.33 [0.96, 1.83] | 4 studies · 2443 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oncoplastic breast‐conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.