Question · asked by 1 review
Systemic corticosteroids plus intranasal steroid/mucolytic/decongestant vs no intervention: Serious adverse events
- Population
- adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection
- Intervention
- Systemic corticosteroids plus intranasal steroid/mucolytic/decongestant
- Comparison
- no intervention
- Outcome
- Serious adverse events
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Systemic corticosteroids plus intranasal steroid/mucolytic/decongestant vs no intervention Serious adverse events · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection Interventions for the treatment of persistent post‐COVID‐19 olfactory dysfunction (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 18 participants | Very low |
Systemic corticosteroids plus intranasal steroid/mucolytic/decongestant vs no intervention Serious adverse events · adults with olfactory dysfunction for ≥ 4 weeks following COVID‐19 infection Interventions for the treatment of persistent post‐COVID‐19 olfactory dysfunction (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD013876.PUB2, superseded | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 18 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for the treatment of persistent post‐COVID‐19 olfactory dysfunction 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.