Question · asked by 1 review

Corticosteroids vs placebo or no treatment: Cosmetically disabling persistent sequelae ≥ 6 months after randomisation Clinical assessment

Corticosteroids showed no clear difference in cosmetically disabling persistent sequelae ≥ 6 months after… compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Corticosteroids vs placebo or no treatment
Cosmetically disabling persistent sequelae ≥ 6 months after randomisation Clinical assessment · people with Bell's palsy
Corticosteroids showed no clear difference in cosmetically disabling persistent sequelae ≥ 6 months after… compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).
Corticosteroids for Bell's palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis) (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.96 [0.4, 2.29]2 studies · 75 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Corticosteroids for Bell's palsy (idiopathic facial paralysis)
2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.