Question · asked by 1 review

Balloon (Foley or ATAD) vs vaginal prostaglandin E2: Serious maternal morbidity or death

Population
third trimester induction of labour in women with a viable fetus
Intervention
Balloon (Foley or ATAD)
Comparison
vaginal prostaglandin E2
Outcome
Serious maternal morbidity or death

It is very uncertain whether balloon (Foley or ATAD) changes serious maternal morbidity or death compared with vaginal prostaglandin E2 (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Balloon (Foley or ATAD) vs vaginal prostaglandin E2
Serious maternal morbidity or death · third trimester labour induction in women with a viable fetus
It is very uncertain whether balloon (Foley or ATAD) changes serious maternal morbidity or death compared with vaginal prostaglandin E2 (very low certainty).
Mechanical methods for induction of labour (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.2 [0.01, 4.12]4 studies · 1481 participantsVery low
Balloon (Foley or ATAD) vs vaginal prostaglandin E2
Serious maternal morbidity or death · third trimester labour induction in women with a viable fetus
It is very uncertain whether balloon (Foley or ATAD) changes serious maternal morbidity or death compared with vaginal prostaglandin E2 (very low certainty).
Mechanical methods for induction of labour (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD001233.PUB3, superseded
RR 0.2 [0.01, 4.12]4 studies · 1481 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Mechanical methods for induction of labour
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.