Question · asked by 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list control: Internalising behaviours 3 months post‐treatment

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list
Internalising behaviours 5 weeks post‐treatment · health problem or population
Community‐based interventions for improving mental health in refugee children and adolescents in high‐income… (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted1 study · 31 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Teaching Recovery Techniques vs waiting list
Internalising behaviours 3 months post‐treatment · health problem or population
Community‐based interventions for improving mental health in refugee children and adolescents in high‐income… (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted1 study · 82 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Community‐based interventions for improving mental health in refugee children and adolescents in high‐income countries
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.