Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination vs tiotropium: Mortality (all‐cause)
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination showed no clear difference in mortality (all‐cause) compared with tiotropium (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination vs tiotropium Mortality (all‐cause) · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Tiotropium + LABA/ICS combination showed no clear difference in mortality (all‐cause) compared with tiotropium (moderate certainty). Combination inhaled steroid and long‐acting beta₂‐agonist in addition to tiotropium versus tiotropium or… (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 1.8 [0.55, 5.91] | 2 studies · 961 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combination inhaled steroid and long‐acting beta₂‐agonist in addition to tiotropium versus tiotropium or combination alone for chronic… 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.