Hall technique vs Sealing: Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival)
- Population
- Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth
- Intervention
- Hall technique
- Comparison
- Sealing
- Outcome
- Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival)
At 12 months, the Hall technique had significantly higher treatment success than sealing (OR 13.93; moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Hall technique vs Sealing Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival) · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth · 12 months, Pediatric dentistry (primary teeth), 12-month follow-up At 12 months, the Hall technique had significantly higher treatment success than sealing (OR 13.93; moderate certainty). Comparative success of minimally invasive treatments for cavitated caries in primary teeth: a network… (2025) All outcomes | OR 13.93 [1.34, 144.52] | 43 studies | Moderate |
Hall technique vs Sealing Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival) · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth · 6 months, Pediatric dentistry (primary teeth), 6-month follow-up At 6 months, the Hall technique had significantly higher treatment success than sealing (OR 90.71; moderate certainty). Comparative success of minimally invasive treatments for cavitated caries in primary teeth: a network… (2025) All outcomes | OR 90.71 [1.57, 5243.63] | 44 studies | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comparative success of minimally invasive treatments for cavitated caries in primary teeth: a network meta-analysis. 2025 All outcomes | November 2024 | 97 | Low / Critically Low |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Hall technique vs Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth · 1 review
- Hall technique vs Conventional restoration · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth · 1 review
- Hall technique vs Silver-modified atraumatic restorative treatment (SMART) · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth · 1 review
- Hall technique vs Silver diamine fluoride · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth · 1 review
- Hall technique vs Fluoride varnish · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth · 1 review
- Hall technique vs placebo · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth · 1 review
- Hall technique vs Partial caries removal (PCR) · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.