Question · asked by 1 review

Hall technique vs placebo: Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival)

Population
Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth
Intervention
Hall technique
Comparison
placebo
Outcome
Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival)

At 6 months, the Hall technique had significantly higher treatment success than placebo (OR 163.59; moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Hall technique vs Placebo
Treatment success (caries lesion arrest or restoration survival) · Children (aged 3-11 y) with cavitated caries lesions in primary teeth · 6 months, Pediatric dentistry (primary teeth), 6-month follow-up
At 6 months, the Hall technique had significantly higher treatment success than placebo (OR 163.59; moderate certainty).
Comparative success of minimally invasive treatments for cavitated caries in primary teeth: a network… (2025) All outcomes
OR 163.59 [10.15, 2636.00]44 studiesModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Comparative success of minimally invasive treatments for cavitated caries in primary teeth: a network meta-analysis.
2025 All outcomes
November 202497Low / Critically Low

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.