Question · asked by 1 review
Traditional iliac bone graft plus fibrin glue vs Traditional iliac bone graft alone: Radiographic assessment: coronal bone density (Hounsfield units)
- Population
- Patients aged 7 to 16 years with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate (alveolar cleft)
- Intervention
- Traditional iliac bone graft plus fibrin glue
- Comparison
- Traditional iliac bone graft alone
- Outcome
- Radiographic assessment: coronal bone density (Hounsfield units)
Traditional iliac bone graft plus fibrin glue led to higher radiographic assessment: coronal bone density (Hounsfield units) compared with traditional iliac bone graft alone; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Traditional iliac bone graft plus fibrin glue vs Traditional iliac bone graft alone Radiographic assessment: coronal bone density (Hounsfield units) · Patients aged 7 to 16 years with unilateral or bilateral cleft lip and palate (alveolar cleft) · At least 3 months Traditional iliac bone graft plus fibrin glue led to higher radiographic assessment: coronal bone density (Hounsfield units) compared with traditional iliac bone graft alone; GRADE not reported. Secondary bone grafting for alveolar cleft in children with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate (2011) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD 150.89 [3.45, 298.33] | 1 study · 27 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secondary bone grafting for alveolar cleft in children with cleft lip or cleft lip and palate 2011 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2011-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.