Question · asked by 1 review
ARP with alloplast vs ARP with xenograft: Changes in probing depth (PD) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site
- Population
- Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring extraction of one or more permanent teeth (mandibular or maxillary, molar or non-molar), with consideration of future delayed dental implant placement
- Intervention
- ARP with alloplast
- Comparison
- ARP with xenograft
- Outcome
- Changes in probing depth (PD) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site
ARP with alloplast showed no clear difference in changes in probing depth (PD) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site compared with ARP with xenograft; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 1 · 50%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
ARP with alloplast vs ARP with xenograft Changes in probing depth (PD) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring… · 12 months ARP with alloplast showed no clear difference in changes in probing depth (PD) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site compared with ARP with xenograft; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site… (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -0.3 [-0.61, 0.01] | 1 study · 25 participants | GRADE not reported |
ARP with alloplast vs ARP with xenograft Changes in probing depth (PD) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site · Adults aged 18 years or older, in good general health (including well-controlled systemic disease), requiring… · 12 months ARP with alloplast showed no clear difference in changes in probing depth (PD) at teeth adjacent to the extraction site compared with ARP with xenograft (low certainty). Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site… (2015) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD010176.PUB2, superseded | MD -0.3 [-0.61, 0.01] | 1 study · 25 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: alveolar ridge preservation techniques for dental implant site development 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.