Question · asked by 1 review

Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE) vs Alvogyl (old formulation): Success rate (radiographically‐assessed healing of cyst healing based on the Neer/Cole rating system)

Population
Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
Intervention
Zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE)
Comparison
Alvogyl (old formulation)
Outcome
Success rate (radiographically‐assessed healing of cyst healing based on the Neer/Cole rating system)

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Zinc oxide eugenol vs Alvogyl (old formulation)
Healing · Adults (>18 years) with established dry socket following permanent tooth extraction
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket) (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
Healing: 2 studies (Faizel 2015; Supe 2018) used different healing outcomes and could not be combined; Alvogyl appeared to heal faster than zinc oxide eugenol. Supe 2018: delayed (non-healed after 10 days) 2/25 Alvogyl…2 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Local interventions for the management of alveolar osteitis (dry socket)
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-09Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.