Question · asked by 1 review

Chronic MND: Cervical/UE Stretch/ROM Exercise + Cervical/UE Strengthening + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs sham: Function: NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability (

Chronic MND: Cervical/UE Stretch/ROM Exercise + Cervical/UE… showed no clear difference in function: 2 months treatment NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum… compared with PLACEBO or SHAM (low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Chronic MND: Cervical/UE Stretch/ROM Exercise + Cervical/UE Strengthening + Dynamic Cervical Stabilization vs PLACEBO or SHAM
Function: 2 months treatment NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum disability ( · patients with chronic MND
Chronic MND: Cervical/UE Stretch/ROM Exercise + Cervical/UE… showed no clear difference in function: 2 months treatment NDI 0 no disability to 50 maximum… compared with PLACEBO or SHAM (low certainty).
Exercises for mechanical neck disorders (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
mean difference 0.121 study · 77 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Exercises for mechanical neck disorders
2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.