Interventionist care vs expectant care: Eclampsia
It is very uncertain whether interventionist care changes eclampsia compared with expectant (delayed delivery) care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Interventionist care vs expectant (delayed delivery) care Eclampsia · women with severe pre‐eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation It is very uncertain whether interventionist care changes eclampsia compared with expectant (delayed delivery) care (very low certainty). Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre‐eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.98 [0.06, 15.58] | 2 studies · 359 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventionist versus expectant care for severe pre‐eclampsia between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.