Question · asked by 1 review
Intubation with FIS vs videolaryngoscope: Change of intubation method
- Population
- airway management during general anaesthesia in obese participants
- Intervention
- Intubation with FIS
- Comparison
- videolaryngoscope
- Outcome
- Change of intubation method
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intubation with FIS vs videolaryngoscope Change of intubation method · obese patients requiring general anaesthesia Tracheal intubation with a flexible intubation scope versus other intubation techniques for obese patients… (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 131 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tracheal intubation with a flexible intubation scope versus other intubation techniques for obese patients requiring general anaesthesia 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.