Cochrane · systematic review · CD010320
Tracheal intubation with a flexible intubation scope versus other intubation techniques for obese patients requiring general anaesthesia
Nicholson, A, Smith, AF, Lewis, SR, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2014 · Cochrane Library
AnaesthesiaAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
5
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 5 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Intubation with FIS versus videolaryngoscope for obese patients requiring general anaesthesia
Population: obese patients requiring general anaesthesia
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Change of intubation method Intubation with FIS vs videolaryngoscope | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 131 participants | Ungraded |
Patients with episodes of desaturation Intubation with FIS vs videolaryngoscope | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 121 participants | Ungraded |
Bleeding during/after intubation Intubation with FIS vs videolaryngoscope | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 131 participants | Ungraded |
Sore throat Intubation with FIS vs videolaryngoscope | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 85 participants | Ungraded |
Successful first intubation Intubation with FIS vs videolaryngoscope | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 131 participants | Ungraded |