Zonisamide vs placebo: Functional abilities Change in TRS part B score (motor tasks) Change in TRS part C score (functional disability) (higher scores indicate a better outcome)
It is very uncertain whether zonisamide changes functional abilities Change in TRS part B score (motor tasks) Change… compared with placebo (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Zonisamide vs placebo Functional abilities Change in TRS part B score (motor tasks) Change in TRS part C score (functional disability) (higher scores indicate a better outcome) · participants with essential tremor It is very uncertain whether zonisamide changes functional abilities Change in TRS part B score (motor tasks) Change… compared with placebo (very low certainty). Zonisamide for essential tremor (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | MD 0 | 1 study · 20 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zonisamide for essential tremor 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.