Question · asked by 1 review
Moxibustion vs sham: QoL
- Population
- Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy
- Intervention
- Moxibustion
- Comparison
- sham
- Outcome
- QoL
Moxibustion may leads to higher qoL (EORTC QLQ‐C30) compared with sham treatment (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Moxibustion vs sham treatment QoL (EORTC QLQ‐C30) · patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy for cancer treatment Moxibustion may leads to higher qoL (EORTC QLQ‐C30) compared with sham treatment (low certainty). Moxibustion for alleviating side effects of chemotherapy or radiotherapy in people with cancer (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | MD 14.88 [4.83, 24.93] | 1 study · 50 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxibustion for alleviating side effects of chemotherapy or radiotherapy in people with cancer 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Moxibustion vs Western medicine · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy · 1 review
- Moxibustion vs no treatment · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.