Question · asked by 1 review
Oral progesterone vs vaginal progesterone: Adverse events, OHSS, preterm delivery, congenital anomaly
- Population
- women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination
- Intervention
- Oral progesterone
- Comparison
- vaginal progesterone
- Outcome
- Adverse events, OHSS, preterm delivery, congenital anomaly
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Oral progesterone vs vaginal progesterone Adverse events, OHSS, preterm delivery, congenital anomaly · women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination The review found no eligible studies for this question. Luteal phase support for women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luteal phase support for women trying to conceive by intrauterine insemination or sexual intercourse 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.