Topical mydriatics vs intracameral mydriatics: AE: posterior capsule rupture
Topical mydriatics showed no clear difference in AE: posterior capsule rupture compared with intracameral mydriatics (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Topical mydriatics vs intracameral mydriatics AE: posterior capsule rupture · patients undergoing cataract surgery Topical mydriatics showed no clear difference in AE: posterior capsule rupture compared with intracameral mydriatics (low certainty). Pharmacologic interventions for mydriasis in cataract surgery (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.32 [0.01, 7.83] | 1 study · 555 participants | Low |
Topical mydriatics vs intracameral mydriatics AE: posterior capsule rupture—any time point during or after surgery · patients undergoing cataract surgery Topical mydriatics showed no clear difference in AE: posterior capsule rupture—any time point during or after surgery compared with intracameral mydriatics (low certainty). Pharmacologic interventions for mydriasis in cataract surgery (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.32 [0.01, 7.83] | 1 study · 555 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pharmacologic interventions for mydriasis in cataract surgery 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.