Question · asked by 1 review
Exercise therapy vs psychological treatment: QoL
- Population
- men and women aged over 18 years with chronic fatigue syndrome
- Intervention
- Exercise therapy
- Comparison
- psychological treatment
- Outcome
- QoL
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions onlyNo studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Exercise therapy vs psychological treatment Quality of Life (QoL) · men and women aged over 18 years with chronic fatigue syndrome The review found no eligible studies for this question. Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Exercise therapy vs psychological treatment Quality of Life (QoL) Measured after 52 weeks Measured on the Quality of Life Scale, 16‐112 points High score means better quality of life · men and women aged over 18 years with chronic fatigue syndrome Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 44 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Exercise therapy vs control · men and women aged over 18 years with chronic fatigue syndrome · 1 review
- Exercise therapy vs antidepressants · men and women aged over 18 years with chronic fatigue syndrome · 1 review
- Exercise therapy vs adaptive pacing therapy · men and women aged over 18 years with chronic fatigue syndrome · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.