Question · asked by 1 review

Clinical effect of simple decompression vs transposition: Subgroup: proportion of participants with clinical improvement in function compared to baseline ‐ simple decompression versus submuscular transposition

Simple decompression showed no clear difference in subgroup: proportion of participants with clinical improvement in… compared with transposition (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Simple decompression vs transposition
Subgroup: proportion of participants with clinical improvement in function compared to baseline ‐ simple decompression versus submuscular transposition · people with ulnar neuropathy at the elbow
Simple decompression showed no clear difference in subgroup: proportion of participants with clinical improvement in… compared with transposition (moderate certainty).
Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.95 [0.77, 1.17]2 studies · 114 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Treatment for ulnar neuropathy at the elbow
2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.