Question · asked by 1 review

Lactobacillus GG vs placebo: Adverse events

Population: Patients with acute pouchitis
Intervention: Lactobacillus GG
Comparison: placebo
Outcome: Adverse events

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

What each review found

No studies found 2 · 100%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Finding	Effect	Studies	GRADE certainty
Lactobacillus GG vs placebo Adverse events · Patients with acute pouchitis The review found no eligible studies for this question. Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD001176.PUB4, superseded	no estimate extracted	Not reported	No studies found
Lactobacillus GG vs placebo Adverse events · Patients with acute pouchitis The review found no eligible studies for this question. Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only	no estimate extracted	Not reported	No studies found

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

Review	Searched up to	Included studies	AMSTAR 2
Treatment and prevention of pouchitis after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only	Not reported	Not extracted	Not assessed

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.