Rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) vs usual care: Treatment modification
It is very uncertain whether rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) changes treatment modification compared with standard care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) vs standard care Treatment modification · people living with HIV It is very uncertain whether rapid antiretroviral therapy (ART) changes treatment modification compared with standard care (very low certainty). Rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 7.89 [0.76, 81.74] | 2 studies · 977 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rapid initiation of antiretroviral therapy for people living with HIV 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.