Question · asked by 1 review
Antenatal pelvic floor muscle training vs control: Adverse events
- Population
- pregnant women, some of who were incontinent symptoms and some who were not when randomised
- Intervention
- Antenatal pelvic floor muscle training
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- Adverse events
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Antenatal pelvic floor muscle training vs control Adverse events · pregnant women, some of who were incontinent symptoms and some who were not when randomised The review found no eligible studies for this question. Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pelvic floor muscle training for preventing and treating urinary and faecal incontinence in antenatal and postnatal women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Antenatal pelvic floor muscle training vs control · pregnant women who were incontinent when randomised · 1 review
- Antenatal pelvic floor muscle training vs control · pregnant women who were continent when randomised · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.