Question · asked by 0 reviews
IVIg vs intravenous methylprednisolone: Change in mean disability score on Rankin scale
- Population
- patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy
- Intervention
- IVIg
- Comparison
- intravenous methylprednisolone
- Outcome
- Change in mean disability score on Rankin scale
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
IVIg vs intravenous methylprednisolone Change in mean disability score on Rankin scale · chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD001797.PUB3, superseded | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 43 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intravenous immunoglobulin for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- IVIg vs plasma exchange · people with CIDP · 1 review
- IVIg vs placebo · people with CIDP · 1 review
- IVIg vs prednisolone · people with CIDP · 1 review
- IVIg vs intravenous methylprednisolone · people with CIDP · 1 review
- IVIg vs prednisolone · patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy · 0 reviews
- IVIg vs placebo · patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy · 0 reviews
- IVIg vs plasma exchange · patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.