Topical triamcinolone acetonide vs Topical curcumin: Pain (mean score)
- Population
- People with symptomatic, biopsy-confirmed oral lichen planus (OLP); not concurrently receiving other OLP treatment
- Intervention
- Topical triamcinolone acetonide
- Comparison
- Topical curcumin
- Outcome
- Pain (mean score)
Topical triamcinolone acetonide may leads to lower pain (mean score) compared with topical curcumin (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Topical triamcinolone acetonide vs Topical curcumin Pain (mean score) · People with symptomatic, biopsy-confirmed oral lichen planus (OLP); not concurrently receiving other OLP treatment Topical triamcinolone acetonide may leads to lower pain (mean score) compared with topical curcumin (low certainty). Interventions for treating oral lichen planus: corticosteroid therapies (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -0.64 [-1.19, -0.10] | 2 studies · 100 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for treating oral lichen planus: corticosteroid therapies 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-02 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Topical triamcinolone acetonide vs Photodynamic therapy · People with symptomatic, biopsy-confirmed oral lichen planus (OLP); not concurrently… · 1 review
- Topical triamcinolone acetonide vs Hyaluronic acid gel · People with symptomatic, biopsy-confirmed oral lichen planus (OLP); not concurrently… · 1 review
- Topical triamcinolone acetonide vs Intralesional BCG-polysaccharide nucleic acid (BCG-PSN) · People with symptomatic, biopsy-confirmed oral lichen planus (OLP); not concurrently… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.