Question · asked by 1 review
External pneumatic intermittent compression vs rest: Woman's perception of pain (as defined by trialists)
- Population
- Pregnant women with varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy
- Intervention
- External pneumatic intermittent compression
- Comparison
- rest
- Outcome
- Woman's perception of pain (as defined by trialists)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
External pneumatic intermittent compression vs rest Woman's perception of pain (as defined by trialists) · Pregnant women with varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.