Question · asked by 1 review
Running shoes recommended and selected on foot posture vs running shoes not recommended and selected on foot posture: Adverse events (e.g. skin complaints) other than musculoskeletal injuries
- Population
- military personnel
- Intervention
- Running shoes recommended and selected on foot posture
- Comparison
- running shoes not recommended and selected on foot posture
- Outcome
- Adverse events (e.g. skin complaints) other than musculoskeletal injuries
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Running shoes recommended and selected on foot posture vs running shoes not recommended and selected on foot posture Adverse events (e.g. skin complaints) other than musculoskeletal injuries · military personnel The review found no eligible studies for this question. Running shoes for preventing lower limb running injuries in adults (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Running shoes for preventing lower limb running injuries in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.