Question · asked by 1 review
Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery) vs usual care or no treatment: Probing pocket depth (PPD/PD)
- Population
- People with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, mostly type 2) and periodontitis, at least 16 years of age
- Intervention
- Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery)
- Comparison
- usual care or no treatment
- Outcome
- Probing pocket depth (PPD/PD)
Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without… led to lower probing pocket depth (PPD/PD) compared with no active intervention/usual care; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without antimicrobials/surgery) vs No active intervention/usual care Probing pocket depth (PPD/PD) · People with diabetes mellitus (type 1 or type 2, mostly type 2) and periodontitis, at least 16 years of age · 3-4 months Periodontal treatment (subgingival instrumentation, with or without… led to lower probing pocket depth (PPD/PD) compared with no active intervention/usual care; GRADE not reported. Treatment of periodontitis for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD -0.56 [-0.72, -0.40] | 21 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment of periodontitis for glycaemic control in people with diabetes mellitus 2022 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-09 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.