Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy vs tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: Secondary procedures
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous nephrolithotripsy changes secondary procedures compared with tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (very low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy vs tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy Secondary procedures It is very uncertain whether percutaneous nephrolithotripsy changes secondary procedures compared with tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (very low certainty). Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.42 [0.02, 9.43] | 1 study · 23 participants | Very low |
Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy vs tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy Secondary procedures It is very uncertain whether percutaneous nephrolithotripsy changes secondary procedures compared with tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (very low certainty). Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyearlier version CD010784.PUB2, superseded | RR 0.42 [0.02, 9.43] | 1 study · 23 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medical and surgical interventions for the treatment of urinary stones in children 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.