Question · asked by 1 review
Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2): Dental caries
- Population
- Children aged 12-15 years (adolescents)
- Intervention
- Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2)
- Comparison
- Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2)
- Outcome
- Dental caries
In adolescents (12-15 y) from weakly contaminated areas, individual studies mostly reported higher DMFT/dmft in exposed children but with wide variation; the review did not pool the data (ungraded).
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 9 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) Dental caries experience (DMFT/dmft index) · Children aged 12-15 years (adolescents) · Chernobyl fallout areas, Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Russian Federation), weak contamination In adolescents (12-15 y) from weakly contaminated areas, individual studies mostly reported higher DMFT/dmft in exposed children but with wide variation; the review did not pool the data (ungraded). A systematic review of the caries prevalence among children living in Chernobyl fallout countries. (2019) All outcomes | WMD 2.27 [2.06, 2.48] | 1 study · 129 participants | GRADE not reported |
Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) Dental caries experience (DMFT/dmft index) · Children aged 12-15 years (adolescents) · Chernobyl fallout areas, Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Russian Federation), weak contamination In adolescents (12-15 y) from weakly contaminated areas, individual studies mostly reported higher DMFT/dmft in exposed children but with wide variation; the review did not pool the data (ungraded). A systematic review of the caries prevalence among children living in Chernobyl fallout countries. (2019) All outcomes | WMD 3.49 [3.26, 3.72] | 1 study · 30 participants | GRADE not reported |
Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) Dental caries experience (DMFT/dmft index) · Children aged 12-15 years (adolescents) · Chernobyl fallout areas, Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Russian Federation), weak contamination In adolescents (12-15 y) from weakly contaminated areas, individual studies mostly reported higher DMFT/dmft in exposed children but with wide variation; the review did not pool the data (ungraded). A systematic review of the caries prevalence among children living in Chernobyl fallout countries. (2019) All outcomes | WMD 2.13 [1.94, 2.32] | 1 study · 151 participants | GRADE not reported |
Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) Dental caries experience (DMFT/dmft index) · Children aged 12-15 years (adolescents) · Chernobyl fallout areas, Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Russian Federation), weak contamination In adolescents (12-15 y) from weakly contaminated areas, individual studies mostly reported higher DMFT/dmft in exposed children but with wide variation; the review did not pool the data (ungraded). A systematic review of the caries prevalence among children living in Chernobyl fallout countries. (2019) All outcomes | WMD 1.88 [1.66, 2.10] | 1 study · 143 participants | GRADE not reported |
Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) Dental caries experience (DMFT/dmft index) · Children aged 12-15 years (adolescents) · Chernobyl fallout areas, Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Russian Federation), weak contamination In adolescents (12-15 y) from weakly contaminated areas, individual studies mostly reported higher DMFT/dmft in exposed children but with wide variation; the review did not pool the data (ungraded). A systematic review of the caries prevalence among children living in Chernobyl fallout countries. (2019) All outcomes | WMD 0.02 [-0.11, 0.15] | 1 study · 137 participants | GRADE not reported |
Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) Dental caries experience (DMFT/dmft index) · Children aged 12-15 years (adolescents) · Chernobyl fallout areas, Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Russian Federation), weak contamination In adolescents (12-15 y) from weakly contaminated areas, individual studies mostly reported higher DMFT/dmft in exposed children but with wide variation; the review did not pool the data (ungraded). A systematic review of the caries prevalence among children living in Chernobyl fallout countries. (2019) All outcomes | WMD -0.18 [-0.35, -0.01] | 1 study · 135 participants | GRADE not reported |
Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) Dental caries experience (DMFT/dmft index) · Children aged 12-15 years (adolescents) · Chernobyl fallout areas, Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Russian Federation), weak contamination In adolescents (12-15 y) from weakly contaminated areas, individual studies mostly reported higher DMFT/dmft in exposed children but with wide variation; the review did not pool the data (ungraded). A systematic review of the caries prevalence among children living in Chernobyl fallout countries. (2019) All outcomes | WMD 0.33 [0.11, 0.55] | 1 study · 127 participants | GRADE not reported |
Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) Dental caries experience (DMFT/dmft index) · Children aged 12-15 years (adolescents) · Chernobyl fallout areas, Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Russian Federation), weak contamination In adolescents (12-15 y) from weakly contaminated areas, individual studies mostly reported higher DMFT/dmft in exposed children but with wide variation; the review did not pool the data (ungraded). A systematic review of the caries prevalence among children living in Chernobyl fallout countries. (2019) All outcomes | WMD 2.02 [1.95, 2.09] | 1 study · 161 participants | GRADE not reported |
Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) Dental caries experience (DMFT/dmft index) · Children aged 12-15 years (adolescents) · Chernobyl fallout areas, Eastern Europe (Ukraine, Belarus, Russian Federation), weak contamination In adolescents (12-15 y) from weakly contaminated areas, individual studies mostly reported higher DMFT/dmft in exposed children but with wide variation; the review did not pool the data (ungraded). A systematic review of the caries prevalence among children living in Chernobyl fallout countries. (2019) All outcomes | WMD 3.40 [2.71, 4.09] | 1 study · 219 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| A systematic review of the caries prevalence among children living in Chernobyl fallout countries. 2019 All outcomes | February 2017 to February 2018 | 9 | Not applicable |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) · Children aged 5-7 years (early school-age) · 1 review
- Residence in weakly contaminated area (approx. 1-5 Ci/km2) vs Residence in non-contaminated (non-exposed) area (<1 Ci/km2) · Children of mixed ages (mean approximately 12 years; no age separation) · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.