Question · asked by 1 review

Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) vs Metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs: Gingival index (GI)

Population
Adults (18 years or older) needing replacement of one premolar or incisor with a cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis
Intervention
Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia)
Comparison
Metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs
Outcome
Gingival index (GI)

Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) showed no clear difference in gingival index (GI) compared with metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) vs Metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs
Gingival index (GI) · Adults (18 years or older) needing replacement of one premolar or incisor with a cantilevered fixed dental prosthesis · 24 months
Metal-free cantilevered FDPs (feldspathic-veneered zirconia) showed no clear difference in gingival index (GI) compared with metal-ceramic cantilevered FDPs; GRADE not reported.
Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD 0.03 [-0.75, 0.81]1 study · 19 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations
2017 · Cochrane All outcomes
2017-05Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.