High maternal allostatic load (chronic stress) and low socioeconomic status vs Lower maternal allostatic load: Dental caries in children
- Population
- Mother-child pairs
- Intervention
- High maternal allostatic load (chronic stress) and low socioeconomic status
- Comparison
- Lower maternal allostatic load
- Outcome
- Dental caries in children
In one cross-sectional study, higher maternal allostatic load was associated with child dental caries experience and with health-related maternal care-taking behaviours; not pooled (ungraded).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
High maternal allostatic load (chronic stress) and low socioeconomic status vs Lower maternal allostatic load Child dental caries experience · Mother-child pairs · General population mother-child pairs, USA (NHANES III) In one cross-sectional study, higher maternal allostatic load was associated with child dental caries experience and with health-related maternal care-taking behaviours; not pooled (ungraded). Social-Biological Interactions in Oral Disease: A 'Cells to Society' View. (2016) All outcomes | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 1184 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Social-Biological Interactions in Oral Disease: A 'Cells to Society' View. 2016 All outcomes | Not specified; literature search covered publications from 1994 to 2015 | 10 | Not applicable |
Studies behind the findings
The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.
- Inhibitory effects of cyclic AMP on vasopressin release from the rat neural lobe in vitro. · 1977 · included by 1 of these review
- Johannsen et al. 2007 · included by 1 of these review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.