Question · asked by 1 review
Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings: Preparation for decision‐making
- Population
- Not specified
- Intervention
- Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information
- Comparison
- usual care ‐ Summary of findings
- Outcome
- Preparation for decision‐making
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Comparison #3: Decision coaching plus evidence‐based information vs usual care ‐ Summary of findings Preparation for decision‐making scale (Bennett 2010): standardised scored from 0 to 100 (none to highest prepared) measured one month post‐intervention (Brown 2019) Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 37 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Decision coaching for people making healthcare decisions 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.