Er:YAG laser debridement vs Manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel: Change in gingival recession (REC)
Er:YAG laser debridement showed no clear difference in change in gingival recession (REC) compared with manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Er:YAG laser debridement vs Manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel Change in gingival recession (REC) · People with at least one dental implant affected by peri-implantitis · 6 months Er:YAG laser debridement showed no clear difference in change in gingival recession (REC) compared with manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | No statistically significant differences for change in recession. | 1 study · 20 participants | GRADE not reported |
Er:YAG laser debridement vs Manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel Change in gingival recession (REC) · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis · 6 months Er:YAG laser debridement showed no clear difference in change in gingival recession (REC) compared with manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2010) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004970.PUB4, superseded | No statistically significant differences for change in recession. | 1 study · 20 participants | GRADE not reported |
Er:YAG laser debridement vs Manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel Change in gingival recession (REC) · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis · 6 months Er:YAG laser debridement showed no clear difference in change in gingival recession (REC) compared with manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2008) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004970.PUB3, superseded | After 6 months there were no statistically significant differences for change in recession. | 1 study · 20 participants | GRADE not reported |
Er:YAG laser debridement vs Manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel Change in gingival recession (REC) · People with at least one dental implant affected by perimplantitis · 6 months Er:YAG laser debridement showed no clear difference in change in gingival recession (REC) compared with manual debridement plus chlorhexidine irrigation/gel; GRADE not reported. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis (2006) · Cochrane All outcomesearlier version CD004970.PUB2, superseded | After 6 months there was no statistically significant difference for change in recession. | 1 study · 20 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: treatment of peri‐implantitis 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2011-06 | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.