Question · asked by 1 review
The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system) vs other local anaesthetic: Adverse effects
- Population
- Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia
- Intervention
- The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system)
- Comparison
- other local anaesthetic
- Outcome
- Adverse effects
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system) vs Traditional local anaesthetic Adverse effects · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia · During LA (injection is the intervention) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental… (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes | Adverse effects: included studies did not report on this outcome | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental treatment 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-05 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system) vs Sleeper One (electronic LA delivery system) · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.