Question · asked by 1 review

Electric toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Manual toothbrush: Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy (participant/carer preference)

Population
Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified
Intervention
Electric toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
Comparison
Manual toothbrush
Outcome
Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy (participant/carer preference)

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Electric toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing) vs Manual toothbrush (self, carer or carer-assisted brushing)
Behaviour, attitude and self-efficacy (participant/carer preference) · Children and adults with mixed levels of ID; setting home, residential, day care, school, mixed or not specified · Long term (>12 months)
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes
Comparison 2.8 (reported; not GRADE-rated). One NRS (Bratel 1991, 23 participants), self-efficacy at 16 months: 10/12 people with ID using the electric toothbrush reported a preference for it, finding it easier to use…1 study · 23 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Oral hygiene interventions for people with intellectual disabilities
2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
2019-02Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.