Question · asked by 1 review

Enhanced one-to-one OHA vs Routine one-to-one OHA: Gingivitis

Population
Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition)
Intervention
Enhanced one-to-one OHA
Comparison
Routine one-to-one OHA
Outcome
Gingivitis

It is very uncertain whether enhanced one-to-one OHA changes periodontal health: gingivitis compared with one-to-one OHA (standard) (very low certainty).

What each review found

Current versions only
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Enhanced one-to-one OHA vs One-to-one OHA (standard)
Periodontal health: gingivitis · Children or adults (fit and healthy, or with a well-defined medical condition) · 2 to 12 months
It is very uncertain whether enhanced one-to-one OHA changes periodontal health: gingivitis compared with one-to-one OHA (standard) (very low certainty).
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes
SoF: 2 studies did not report usable data; 1 study gave low-quality evidence of a benefit in gingivitis reduction at 5.5 months for enhanced OHA; 3 studies found little or no difference across all time points. Results:…5 studies · 430 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
One‐to‐one oral hygiene advice provided in a dental setting for oral health
2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
2017-11Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.