Continuous CTG vs intermittent auscultation: Perinatal mortality
- Population
- Pregnant women undergoing fetal assessment during labour
- Intervention
- Continuous CTG
- Comparison
- intermittent auscultation
- Outcome
- Perinatal mortality
Continuous CTG showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality compared with intermittent auscultation (low certainty).
What each review found
Current versions only| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Continuous CTG vs intermittent auscultation Perinatal mortality · Pregnant women undergoing fetal assessment during labour Continuous CTG showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality compared with intermittent auscultation (low certainty). Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during… (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.86 [0.59, 1.24] | 11 studies · 33513 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Continuous CTG vs intermittent auscultation · Women undergoing fetal assessment during labour · 0 reviews
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.