Question · asked by 1 review

Two-phase oil-water mouthrinse (0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride) vs Control mouthwash: Volatile sulphur compounds (VSC), halimeter

Oil water two-phase mouthwash (with cetylpyridinium chloride) showed no clear difference in volatile sulphur compounds (VSC), sulphide monitor compared with control mouthwash; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Oil water two-phase mouthwash (with cetylpyridinium chloride) vs Control mouthwash
Volatile sulphur compounds (VSC), sulphide monitor · Adolescents and adults aged over 16 years with clinical or self-assessed halitosis of oral origin; excluding induced… · 1 week
Oil water two-phase mouthwash (with cetylpyridinium chloride) showed no clear difference in volatile sulphur compounds (VSC), sulphide monitor compared with control mouthwash; GRADE not reported.
Interventions for managing halitosis (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -11.0 [-25.26, 3.26]1 study · 50 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for managing halitosis
2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
2019-04list not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.